China Is Planning To Visit Mars By 2020 And Beat Nasa To Set Up The First Manned Moon Base

 

China has finally announced that it plans to visit Mars by 2020, along with being one of the first nations to walk on the “far side” of the moon. In an unusual video discussion with the BBC, Wu Weiren, a high-ranking official in the China National Space Administration (CNSA) who worked as chief of China’s moon and Mars missions, publicized that China is presently working on a certain Mars probe exploration mission. Wu said “We will orbit Mars, land and deploy a rover — all in one mission. We could have started our Mars mission earlier but finally the country has given its approval.”

What’s even more interesting is that, China also aims to effectively colonize the moon by establishing a manned base. Wu explained “Our short-term goal is to orbit the moon, land on the moon and take samples back from the moon. Our long-term goal is to explore, land, and settle. We want a manned lunar landing to stay for longer periods and establish a research base. It’s quite challenging to land there, but according to research there might be water or ice because of the lack of sunlight, so we’d very much like to check that out.”

Seems like the movie “The Martian” has made quite an impression on China. Contrary to what you are thinking, Wu also said that China is very much hopeful to cooperate with space agencies from other countries such as NASA in the US – much like in film The Martian, where China’s space agency presents its Taiyang Shen space rocket booster to direct rescue supplies to NASA astronaut Mark Watney, who is trapped on Mars with decreasing resources.

In this whole situation China is not the bad guy neither is the US but US Congress has already passed a spending bill in 2011 particularly restricting NASA from working in China, due to a high risk of spying.

Wu said “We would like to co-operate with the US, especially for space and moon exploration. We have urged the US many times to get rid of restrictions so scientists from both countries can work together on future exploration.”

According to Reuters, a senior Chinese space official Xu Dazhe, the chief of the China National Space Administration, said at a press conference on 22 April that The Martian film displays that the US would not be adverse to working with China.

Xu said “When I saw the US film The Martian, which envisages China-US cooperation on a Mars rescue mission under emergency circumstances, it shows that our U.S. counterparts very much hope to co-operate with us.”

“However, it’s very regrettable that, for reasons everyone is aware of, there are currently some impediments to cooperation. I believe that on this matter, China is more and more open, and I hope our American friends can take note.”

As some people might think, this is not a race because overall, this all is going to be a huge step in human history regardless of who goes first.

Astronomers Discovered A Second ‘Alien Megastructure’ Star That’s Even Stranger Than Kic 8462852

 

The strangest star in the universe is not alone. In 2015, astronomers reported unusual 

behaviors in the star "KIC 8462852" which they could not explain. Now, another team has 

discovered a second star that behaves similarly to KIC 8462852. It is called 

"EPIC 204278916" and is even stranger than the first. Find out more about this mysterious 

star in the video below:

We Might lastly Solve the ‘Alien Mega-structure’ Mystery

 

Good information alien hunters! A Kickstarter to fund a one-year study on KIC 

8462852 - the star most likely voted to host a higher alien civilization - has 

just been funded. Alien megastructure or not, we could finally get to the 

bottom of this bewildering and flickering star.



This crowdfunding movement was set up in May by astronomer Yale Tabby Boyajian 

and manages to reach the $ 100,000 goal in just 30 days. A $ 10,000 hike in the 

previous 100 minutes of the campaign managed to put the plan on top. The next 

step is to understand the logistics, but Boyajian, who led the study on 

KIC 8462852, says that the observations could create as early as next summer.



 The ultimate goal of the plan will be to decide why the light from this star 

dims at such irregular intervals, and sometimes up to 20 percent. These huge 

drops in brightness are too big to be a passing planet, so the doubt that the 

anomaly is caused by swarms of comets, an indistinct star, an unidentified 

astronomical phenomenon or an alien civilization advanced in the process of 

building a giant solar matrix around the star.











Boyajian will now be able to ensure secure year-round access to the global 
network of telescopes at the Las Cumbres observatory. If the system detects 
any additional anomalies, a warning will be sent to other astronomers, who will 
then twist their telescopes on the star.


The most important thing right now is for astronomers to get more consistent 
data and replicate existing results. KIC 8462852 was first reported by 
scientist citizens who were thoroughly investigated through data collected by 
NASA's Kepler Space Telescope between 2009 and 2013. Some new observations, 
especially incoming signals in real time , they would have been nice. If the 
latest drops in brightness are detected, astronomers should be able to spot 
patterns.



Last year, speculation was based on whether KIC 8462852 may or may not be an 
alien megastructure, possibly a Dyson sphere. The star may not be wrapped in a 
Dyson sphere, but that shouldn't stop scientists from looking for signs that 
can show or refute its existence. If this star is obstructed by a megastructure 
under construction, it should emit obvious signals in the form of thermal 
radiation from the black body. The point of a Dyson sphere is to collect solar 
energy, but leaks are likely to occur.


If there is a partial Dyson sphere, we should be able to notice it motionless 
in the form of irregular but recognizable emission signatures.

Black Holes Could Be ‘Back Doors’ To Another Universe, Say Physicists

 

A physical object, such as a person or a spacecraft, could theoretically make it through a 

wormhole in the center of a black hole, and perhaps even access another universe on the 

other side, physicists have suggested. In what appears to be the logical extension of the 

Interstellar plot in which astronauts try to chase another universe after the catastrophic 

effects of climate change destroy Earth - physicists have modeled what would happen to a 

chair, a scientist and a vehicle spatial, if each ended up in the spherical wormhole of a 

black hole.

"What we did was to reconsider a fundamental question about the relationship between 

gravity and the underlying structure of space-time. In practical terms, we dropped a 

hypothesis that takes general relativity into consideration, but there is no reason a 

priori to support it in the extensions of this theory. ”said one of the members, Diego 

Rubiera-Garcia of the University of Lisbon in Portugal.

So, let's take a step back and analyze some basics. According to Einstein's theory of 

general relativity, there is a singularity at the center of a black hole - the point where 

the forces of gravity are at their maximum intensity, and time and space actually end. If 

an object approaches the event horizon, it would be crushed in one direction and stretched 

in another, thanks to the extreme gravity forces of the tide that play inside a black hole. If the object remains

 intact long enough to reach the center of a black hole, it will be infinitely long and thin: in practice, it has been 

spaghettified beyond recognition. Physicists have been playing for years with the hypothesis of a singularity in 

the center of a black hole, because until we can actually prove that it exists, there may be many possibilities that 

still work - in theory.

Earlier this year, physicists from the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom argued 

that there is no reason why a singularity should necessarily be inside a black hole. They 

suggest that in a universe with five or more dimensions - which for us is not out of the 

question - a "nude" may exist individually, which is not delimited by a horizon of events.

Of course, that would mean big and huge things for our current understanding of how the 

laws of physics govern our Universe, because basically it needs Einstein's theory of general

relativity to be wrong.

"If naked singularities exist, general relativity will fail," said one of the teams, Saran 

Tunyasuvunakool, in January. "And if general relativity fails, it would turn everything upside down, because it

 would no longer have any predictive power - it could no longer be considered an autonomous theory to explain

 the Universe."

Even making mistakes Einstein is not to be excluded. Stephen Hawking has fought for decades 

with how general relativity seems to collide with quantum mechanics in black holes, a problem

known as the information paradox.

Assuming that the clauses of general relativity are not fixed in the stone, the new study 

of the Rubiera-Garcia team argues that if you remove the singularity from a black hole, 

what you get in the center is a finite-sized wormhole instead.

So, they understood what could happen if various objects - a chair, a scientist and a 

spacecraft - managed to overcome the event horizon and in the wormhole. These objects are 

called "observers".

They modeled these observers as an aggregation of points connected by physical or chemical 

interactions that hold everything together while the object travels along a geodesic line. 

A geodesic line is simply the path in space-time that follows an object in free fall.

"Each particle of the observer follows a geodesic line determined by the gravitational 

field," says Rubiera-Garcia. "Each geodesist feels a slightly different gravitational 

force, but interactions between body components may still support the body."

By publishing in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, the researchers demonstrate 

this by showing how the time spent by a ray of light on a circular journey between two 

parts of the body has always ended.

This means that finite forces, no matter how strong, could compensate for the impact of the 

gravitational field near and inside the wormhole on a physical body that passes through it.

"Therefore, different parts of the body will still establish physical or chemical interactions 

and, consequently, cause and effect will still apply to the wormhole throat," they explain.

So while general relativity theory predicts that an object approaching a black hole will be 

crushed in one direction and stretched in another infinitely, if we assume that the center 

of a black hole is a wormhole with a finite ray , the object can only be crushed as much as 

the size of the wormhole.

This means that according to the Rubiera-Garcia hypothesis, an object could survive a 

journey through a wormhole and make it on the other side - and potentially in another 

universe - technically intact, but it would be crushed to the size of the finished wormhole.

 At least it's not completely destroyed, right?

"For a theoretical physicist, the suffering of observers is admissible 

(one could even consider it part of an experimenter's work), but their total destruction is 

not," Rubiera-Garcia and his team cite a piece of opinion.

Until we find out how to actually see a black hole, all of this will remain well and truly 

in the realm of pure hypotheses. But we are beginning to see how black holes might not be 

the horrible deadly traps that we erase the existence we thought they were.

At a conference in August 2015 Hawking said of his solution to the information paradox: 

“The message of this lesson is that black holes are not as black as they are painted. They 

are not eternal prisons as they were once thought. If you feel like you're in a black hole, 

don't give up. There is a way out. "

That’s No Moon. It’s an Alien Observatory Made to Keep an Eye on Us!

 

Sure, stating that the moon is artificial may sound crazy, but why does it sound like a bell

when hit?

Previous expeditions to the moon have reported a significant amount of information, but our 

planet's natural satellite still remains largely a mystery to researchers. The first man 

ever hit by NASA to head the Lunar Exploration Commission, dr. Jastrow, called the Moon "the

Rosetta stone of the planets.

Many UFOlogists are convinced that the Moon, which everyone believes to be a natural 

satellite, was in fact built by a more advanced civilization as a study base in which to 

document the behavior of our species.

Others believe that aliens are not as interested in our society as they do not understand 

intra-racial violence, so the Moon acts as a simple watchtower that would let them know if 

humanity would ever try to leave Earth and travel in space. . theorists claim that his body 

is covered by a rocky layer, which could measure more than 3 miles from the surface, sitting

on top of a shell made of extremely durable chemical components, which could even withstand 

a large-scale impact such as with an asteroid or a comet without taking much damage.

A NASA researcher named Robin Brett once declared: "It seems easier to explain the 

non-existence of the Moon than its existence."

Here are some strange facts that make us believe that the Moon was actually built from 

scratch.

In 1969, the United States built a module for the sole purpose of crashing it on the moon 

to study side effects. The estimated power it had accumulated on impact was said to be one 

thousand kilograms of TNT. After the controlled incident, the experts observed the waves 

generated by the shock and were stunned. The moon made a sound similar to that of a gigantic

bell and the echo continued for more than half an hour. Ken Johnson, the man who oversaw the

photo and information, stated that the Moon also vibrated or "faltered" symmetrically, 

"almost as if it had gigantic hydraulic shock absorbers inside."

Alexander Shcerbakov and Mikhail Vasin published an article in the 70s, entitled "Is the 

moon the creation of alien intelligence?" In the article, they ask some very legitimate 

questions and expose known facts that defy any logical explanation. The surface of the Moon,

the only part that could be studied, contains minerals and is mainly made up of unusually 

hard matter.

It has also been discovered that specimens recovered from the Moon contain forged metal 

material, which could not have formed there or arrived on its own. Scientists have 

discovered highly transformed parts of uranium that science has never been able to obtain 

through natural processes. They also found traces of radioactive metals normally used to 

produce large-scale plutonium. This is all clear evidence that the Moon is not as inactive 

as we are led to believe.

It is known that our moon does not have a hard core like other planets or natural satellites

do and the mass is concentrated in a number of points, many of which are located at a very 

shallow depth.

Another well-known fact is that the Moon is more than 4 and a half billion years old, making

it nearly a million years older than our planet. It is unlike any other satellite known 

throughout the universe. Unlike any other natural satellite, the moon describes a perfect 

round orbit around the planet it is surrounding. No matter where you look, one side of the 

moon will always be invisible.

Titanium, a very rare and expensive metal on Earth, used for the development of advanced 

technologies (space or submarine shuttles), is found in large and concentrated quantities 

within the rocks on the moon. Harold Urey, a Nobel Prize-winning chemist, is still very 

confused by this fact.

Strange facts like the ones you just read keep piling up every day, while modern science 

can't explain them. Not only is the amount of information about the moon very low, but the 

percentage of people who have access to it is kept under control.

NASA is Planning to Capture an Asteroid and Put it in Orbit Around the Moon

 

NASA is planning a mission to redirect an asteroid in orbit around the moon. The space 

agency has identified a number of potential asteroid candidates. Once chosen, NASA will 

launch a robotic mission to visit the asteroid. When this robotic spacecraft arrives at 

the intended asteroid, it will pick up a multi-ton boulder and redirect it to the moon. 

A team of astronauts will then visit the boulder in orbit and collect samples to bring 

them back to earth.
 

The asteroid redirection mission [ARM] will begin in the early 2020s. It is part of NASA's plan to test and advance the technologies needed for the mission to Mars in the 2030s.

Shocking News Alien Mega structure In Universe

 

Before 3- months ago, news had arrived that a gigantic "mega alien structure" 

could survive around a bizarre-looking star 1,500 light-years away. The first 

signs of this spatial peculiarity came from NASA's Kepler space telescope 

chasing planets, which constantly observed the star's sky region between 2009 

and 2013. Most of the stars that host the planet seem to be small regular dives 

to the light when their planets pass in front of them. But Tabby's star dipped 

randomly during the 4 years, occasionally losing up to 20 percent of its 

brightness. In September 2015, a group led by Tabetha Boyajian of Yale 

University, who gave the star its informal name, tried to make sense of this 

strange signal. Eventually they decided that the main explanation was dust from 

a huge cloud of comets.



A month later, the star's full title crosses the globe thanks to an article by 

Jason Wright of Pennsylvania State University and his companions, who suggested 

that "mega alien structures", such as satellites designed to collect light from 

the star, could be responsible for the signal.

While the alien scene was first launched by Penn State scientist Jason Wright, 

almost everyone in astronomy people agreed that the odds of this being the case 

were "very low".

Now, the most recent investigation into this bizarre star by Louisiana State 

University scientist Bradley Schaefer has rekindled alien theory, according to 

the latest scientist.



Currently Bradley Schaefer of Louisiana State University has discovered that the

mystery goes even further. When the Boyajian team studied the star, they look at

data from the Harvard University report on the digitally scanned photographic 

plates of the sky from the record to see if the star had behaved strangely in 

the past, but they didn't start anything. Archefer has determined this strange 

star deserves a second look. He averaged the data in a 5-year container to look 

for long-term slow trends and found that the star faded about 20% between 1890 

and 1989. "The basic effect is small and not obvious ", he claims.

To demonstrate that the fade was real, Schaefer travels to Harvard to look at the original 

photographic plates and inspect them with an eye for any changes, a skill that minority 

scientists have these days. "Since nobody uses multiple photographic plates, it is basically

 a lost art, "says Wright." Schaefer is a specialist in this area. "



Schaefer saw the same century-long darkening in his physical reading, and calculated that 

648,000 comets would have to pass, every 200 kilometers wide, to be passed by the star - 

completely implausible, he says.