NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory shared some surprising new footage of their latest flights over Mars. Some recent flybys have revealed new avalanche images that are forming on Mars. These flybys have helped scientists develop new and more accurate theories of the sea and its past. Learn more about this in the video below: 
The strangest star in the universe is not alone. In 2015, astronomers reported unusual behaviors in the star "KIC 8462852" which they could not explain. Now, another team has discovered a second star that behaves similarly to KIC 8462852. It is called "EPIC 204278916" and is even stranger than the first. Find out more about this mysterious star in the video below: 
Good information alien hunters! A Kickstarter to fund a one-year study on KIC 8462852 - the star most likely voted to host a higher alien civilization - has just been funded. Alien megastructure or not, we could finally get to the bottom of this bewildering and flickering star.
This crowdfunding movement was set up in May by astronomer Yale Tabby Boyajian and manages to reach the $ 100,000 goal in just 30 days. A $ 10,000 hike in the previous 100 minutes of the campaign managed to put the plan on top. The next step is to understand the logistics, but Boyajian, who led the study on KIC 8462852, says that the observations could create as early as next summer.
The ultimate goal of the plan will be to decide why the light from this star dims at such irregular intervals, and sometimes up to 20 percent. These huge drops in brightness are too big to be a passing planet, so the doubt that the anomaly is caused by swarms of comets, an indistinct star, an unidentified astronomical phenomenon or an alien civilization advanced in the process of building a giant solar matrix around the star.
Boyajian will now be able to ensure secure year-round access to the global network of telescopes at the Las Cumbres observatory. If the system detects any additional anomalies, a warning will be sent to other astronomers, who will then twist their telescopes on the star.
The most important thing right now is for astronomers to get more consistent data and replicate existing results. KIC 8462852 was first reported by scientist citizens who were thoroughly investigated through data collected by NASA's Kepler Space Telescope between 2009 and 2013. Some new observations, especially incoming signals in real time , they would have been nice. If the latest drops in brightness are detected, astronomers should be able to spot patterns.
Last year, speculation was based on whether KIC 8462852 may or may not be an alien megastructure, possibly a Dyson sphere. The star may not be wrapped in a Dyson sphere, but that shouldn't stop scientists from looking for signs that can show or refute its existence. If this star is obstructed by a megastructure under construction, it should emit obvious signals in the form of thermal radiation from the black body. The point of a Dyson sphere is to collect solar energy, but leaks are likely to occur.
If there is a partial Dyson sphere, we should be able to notice it motionless in the form of irregular but recognizable emission signatures. 
A physical object, such as a person or a spacecraft, could theoretically make it through a wormhole in the center of a black hole, and perhaps even access another universe on the other side, physicists have suggested. In what appears to be the logical extension of the Interstellar plot in which astronauts try to chase another universe after the catastrophic effects of climate change destroy Earth - physicists have modeled what would happen to a chair, a scientist and a vehicle spatial, if each ended up in the spherical wormhole of a black hole.
"What we did was to reconsider a fundamental question about the relationship between gravity and the underlying structure of space-time. In practical terms, we dropped a hypothesis that takes general relativity into consideration, but there is no reason a priori to support it in the extensions of this theory. ”said one of the members, Diego Rubiera-Garcia of the University of Lisbon in Portugal.
So, let's take a step back and analyze some basics. According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, there is a singularity at the center of a black hole - the point where the forces of gravity are at their maximum intensity, and time and space actually end. If an object approaches the event horizon, it would be crushed in one direction and stretched in another, thanks to the extreme gravity forces of the tide that play inside a black hole. If the object remains intact long enough to reach the center of a black hole, it will be infinitely long and thin: in practice, it has been spaghettified beyond recognition. Physicists have been playing for years with the hypothesis of a singularity in the center of a black hole, because until we can actually prove that it exists, there may be many possibilities that still work - in theory.
Earlier this year, physicists from the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom argued that there is no reason why a singularity should necessarily be inside a black hole. They suggest that in a universe with five or more dimensions - which for us is not out of the question - a "nude" may exist individually, which is not delimited by a horizon of events.
Of course, that would mean big and huge things for our current understanding of how the laws of physics govern our Universe, because basically it needs Einstein's theory of generalrelativity to be wrong."If naked singularities exist, general relativity will fail," said one of the teams, Saran Tunyasuvunakool, in January. "And if general relativity fails, it would turn everything upside down, because it would no longer have any predictive power - it could no longer be considered an autonomous theory to explain the Universe."
Even making mistakes Einstein is not to be excluded. Stephen Hawking has fought for decades with how general relativity seems to collide with quantum mechanics in black holes, a problemknown as the information paradox.
Assuming that the clauses of general relativity are not fixed in the stone, the new study of the Rubiera-Garcia team argues that if you remove the singularity from a black hole, what you get in the center is a finite-sized wormhole instead.
So, they understood what could happen if various objects - a chair, a scientist and a spacecraft - managed to overcome the event horizon and in the wormhole. These objects are called "observers".
They modeled these observers as an aggregation of points connected by physical or chemical interactions that hold everything together while the object travels along a geodesic line. A geodesic line is simply the path in space-time that follows an object in free fall.
"Each particle of the observer follows a geodesic line determined by the gravitational field," says Rubiera-Garcia. "Each geodesist feels a slightly different gravitational force, but interactions between body components may still support the body."
By publishing in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, the researchers demonstrate this by showing how the time spent by a ray of light on a circular journey between two parts of the body has always ended.
This means that finite forces, no matter how strong, could compensate for the impact of the gravitational field near and inside the wormhole on a physical body that passes through it."Therefore, different parts of the body will still establish physical or chemical interactions and, consequently, cause and effect will still apply to the wormhole throat," they explain.
So while general relativity theory predicts that an object approaching a black hole will be crushed in one direction and stretched in another infinitely, if we assume that the center of a black hole is a wormhole with a finite ray , the object can only be crushed as much as the size of the wormhole.
This means that according to the Rubiera-Garcia hypothesis, an object could survive a journey through a wormhole and make it on the other side - and potentially in another universe - technically intact, but it would be crushed to the size of the finished wormhole. At least it's not completely destroyed, right?
"For a theoretical physicist, the suffering of observers is admissible (one could even consider it part of an experimenter's work), but their total destruction is not," Rubiera-Garcia and his team cite a piece of opinion.
Until we find out how to actually see a black hole, all of this will remain well and truly in the realm of pure hypotheses. But we are beginning to see how black holes might not be the horrible deadly traps that we erase the existence we thought they were.
At a conference in August 2015 Hawking said of his solution to the information paradox: “The message of this lesson is that black holes are not as black as they are painted. They are not eternal prisons as they were once thought. If you feel like you're in a black hole, don't give up. There is a way out. " 
Sure, stating that the moon is artificial may sound crazy, but why does it sound like a bellwhen hit?
Previous expeditions to the moon have reported a significant amount of information, but our planet's natural satellite still remains largely a mystery to researchers. The first man ever hit by NASA to head the Lunar Exploration Commission, dr. Jastrow, called the Moon "theRosetta stone of the planets.
Many UFOlogists are convinced that the Moon, which everyone believes to be a natural satellite, was in fact built by a more advanced civilization as a study base in which to document the behavior of our species.
Others believe that aliens are not as interested in our society as they do not understand intra-racial violence, so the Moon acts as a simple watchtower that would let them know if humanity would ever try to leave Earth and travel in space. . theorists claim that his body is covered by a rocky layer, which could measure more than 3 miles from the surface, sittingon top of a shell made of extremely durable chemical components, which could even withstand a large-scale impact such as with an asteroid or a comet without taking much damage.
A NASA researcher named Robin Brett once declared: "It seems easier to explain the non-existence of the Moon than its existence."
Here are some strange facts that make us believe that the Moon was actually built from scratch.
In 1969, the United States built a module for the sole purpose of crashing it on the moon to study side effects. The estimated power it had accumulated on impact was said to be one thousand kilograms of TNT. After the controlled incident, the experts observed the waves generated by the shock and were stunned. The moon made a sound similar to that of a giganticbell and the echo continued for more than half an hour. Ken Johnson, the man who oversaw thephoto and information, stated that the Moon also vibrated or "faltered" symmetrically, "almost as if it had gigantic hydraulic shock absorbers inside."Alexander Shcerbakov and Mikhail Vasin published an article in the 70s, entitled "Is the
moon the creation of alien intelligence?" In the article, they ask some very legitimate questions and expose known facts that defy any logical explanation. The surface of the Moon,the only part that could be studied, contains minerals and is mainly made up of unusually hard matter.
It has also been discovered that specimens recovered from the Moon contain forged metal material, which could not have formed there or arrived on its own. Scientists have discovered highly transformed parts of uranium that science has never been able to obtain through natural processes. They also found traces of radioactive metals normally used to produce large-scale plutonium. This is all clear evidence that the Moon is not as inactive as we are led to believe.
It is known that our moon does not have a hard core like other planets or natural satellitesdo and the mass is concentrated in a number of points, many of which are located at a very shallow depth.
Another well-known fact is that the Moon is more than 4 and a half billion years old, makingit nearly a million years older than our planet. It is unlike any other satellite known throughout the universe. Unlike any other natural satellite, the moon describes a perfect round orbit around the planet it is surrounding. No matter where you look, one side of the moon will always be invisible.
Titanium, a very rare and expensive metal on Earth, used for the development of advanced technologies (space or submarine shuttles), is found in large and concentrated quantities within the rocks on the moon. Harold Urey, a Nobel Prize-winning chemist, is still very confused by this fact.
Strange facts like the ones you just read keep piling up every day, while modern science can't explain them. Not only is the amount of information about the moon very low, but the percentage of people who have access to it is kept under control.
NASA is planning a mission to redirect an asteroid in orbit around the moon. The space agency has identified a number of potential asteroid candidates. Once chosen, NASA will launch a robotic mission to visit the asteroid. When this robotic spacecraft arrives at the intended asteroid, it will pick up a multi-ton boulder and redirect it to the moon. A team of astronauts will then visit the boulder in orbit and collect samples to bring them back to earth.
Cassandra Khaw's Nothing But Blackened Teeth is a gorgeously creepy haunted house tale, steeped in Japanese folklore and full of de...
